Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante: Understanding the Recent Monument Reductions

July 17, 2026

Bears Ears National Monument and Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument have once again become the focus of debate over the future of America's public lands. Executive actions in 2025 and 2026 reduced portions of both monuments, renewing discussions about conservation, local control, and the role of the federal government in managing public land.

This article provides an overview of what changed, why supporters favor the reductions, why opponents object, and what the changes mean for visitors.

At a Glance

Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante were designated as national monuments to protect significant cultural, archaeological, geological, and natural resources.
Executive actions in 2025 and 2026 reduced the acreage designated as national monuments.
Supporters say the changes improve local management and allow additional multiple-use opportunities.
Opponents argue the reductions leave important cultural sites, wildlife habitat, and scientific resources more vulnerable.
Both monuments remain open to the public and continue to include many of their most well-known destinations.

A Brief History

Bears Ears National Monument was established in 2016 and originally protected approximately 1.35 million acres in southeastern Utah. The landscape contains thousands of archaeological sites and holds deep cultural and spiritual significance for several Native American tribes.

Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument was designated in 1996 and originally encompassed about 1.9 million acres. It is known for its dramatic canyon country, remote backcountry, and world-class paleontological discoveries.

Both monuments have experienced multiple boundary changes over the past decade. The latest executive actions in 2025 and 2026 reduced portions of the designated monument acreage and directed updates to management plans.

Arguments Supporting the Reductions

Supporters believe the revised boundaries create a more balanced approach to public land management. Common arguments include:

Protecting Priority Areas: Focusing monument protections on locations with the highest cultural, scenic, geological, and ecological value.
Greater Local Involvement: Giving state and local communities a larger role in land management decisions.
Expanded Multiple Use: Allowing additional opportunities for grazing, mineral development, and energy production on lands removed from monument designation.
More Practical Management: Managing smaller monument boundaries may simplify planning and reduce administrative complexity.

Arguments Opposing the Reductions

Many tribes, conservation organizations, archaeologists, and scientists oppose the changes. Their concerns generally focus on the following issues:

Cultural Resources: Lands removed from monument designation contain numerous archaeological sites and places considered culturally important by Native American tribes.
Wildlife Habitat: Larger protected landscapes can better preserve migration corridors and connected ecosystems.
Scientific Research: Grand Staircase-Escalante has produced hundreds of important fossil discoveries. Some researchers believe reducing monument boundaries could make certain resources more difficult to protect.
Tourism: Many gateway communities benefit from outdoor recreation and tourism associated with the monuments. Critics argue long-term recreation economies may provide greater value than resource extraction.
Future Precedent: Opponents also question whether reducing monument boundaries could influence future decisions affecting other protected public lands.

Current Status

Both monuments remain open to public recreation. Many popular destinations, including Cedar Mesa, the Grand Staircase, and Hole-in-the-Rock Road, continue to be accessible. Hiking, camping, photography, hunting where permitted, and other outdoor recreation opportunities remain available under current management.

Management plans will continue to evolve as federal agencies implement the latest directives and respond to ongoing legal and administrative actions.

Why This Matters

Changes to national monument boundaries affect more than maps. They influence how public lands are managed, what activities are allowed, and how cultural, natural, and economic interests are balanced.

Whether someone supports or opposes the reductions often depends on which priorities they value most. Some emphasize local decision-making and expanded land use, while others prioritize long-term conservation and protection of cultural resources. Understanding both perspectives helps create informed discussions about the future of America's public lands.

Learn More

BLM Bears Ears National Monument
BLM Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument
Bears Ears Commission (Tribal perspective)
Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance (Conservation perspective)
Recreation.gov for permits, maps, and current conditions.

Bears Ears and Grand Staircase-Escalante remain two of the most remarkable landscapes in the American Southwest. No matter where you stand on the policy debate, responsible recreation and Leave No Trace principles help preserve these places for future generations.

Back to blog